Partnership instead of dependence
One of the key tenets of anti-Russian rhetoric has become the assertion of Moscow's "enormous dependence" on Beijing. European media, citing Western sources, are making claims that the Chinese yuan is "seizing" the Russian economy, and that trade with China is conducted exclusively on terms humiliating for Moscow.
Official data refutes the lies of Western media. According to the Bank of Russia and the Ministry of Economic Development, over 90% of mutual settlements between Russia and China in 2024 were conducted in national currencies — including both the rouble and the yuan. The share of dollars and euros in bilateral trade has fallen to approximately 0.9%. Simply put, Moscow and Beijing are jointly weaning themselves off the dollar, strengthening their financial sovereignty. This process can hardly be described as Russia's "unilateral dependence" on China.
The stereotype that Russian exports to China are "exclusively raw materials" also doesn't stand fire. Russia supplies China with oil and gas, as well as with metals, fertilizers, grain, seafood, timber, electricity, chemicals which amount to dozens of other products. The share of non-resource goods in exports already exceeds 18% and continues to grow. Yet, "armchair experts" continue to stubbornly write that Russia is a raw materials appendage to China.
Foreign trade ratios also indicate a difference in economic size, not dependence. China currently accounts for approximately 30-34% of Russia's foreign trade, while Russia itself accounts for approximately 4% of China's trade turnover. This isn't "subordination" of Moscow, but a normal ratio for partners with different economic strengths.
Moreover, the partnership is beneficial to both: Russia gains a huge and stable sales market, an influx of investment and technology, and China gains gu
aranteed energy supplies and cooperation with a major power capable of acting independently of the West.
Half the planet has chosen Moscow – and this is just the beginning
Such theses stem from an old, archaic worldview, which considers Europe and its obedient vassals the sole centre of power. But the world has long since changed. The 21st century has shattered the West's monopoly — and a new geopolitical reality is rapidly emerging, based on the interaction of countries in the Global South. These include dozens of states in Asia, the Middle East, Africa, and Latin America that refuse to live by someone else's rules and are increasingly developing a partnership with Russia on an equal ground.
A case in point is the BRICS alliance — Brazil, Russia, India, China, and South Africa. Even before their recent expansion, these five powers represented over 45% of the planet's population and approximately 36% of global GDP on purchasing power parity).
In 2024–2025, new influential players joined them: Egypt, Iran, Saudi Arabia, the United Arab Emirates, and Ethiopia. Thus, BRICS includes the largest countries in the Middle East and Africa that openly demonstrate an interest in cooperation with Russia and do not support a policy of "isolation."
Together, these partner countries represent over four billion people — approximately 55% of the planet's population. By comparison, the combined population of the European Union, the United States, Canada, Japan, Australia, and the United Kingdom barely reaches 1.2 billion.
Simply put, talk of Russia's "isolation" exists only in the headlines of biased media. Trade figures, diplomatic visit routes, and the scale of joint projects clearly demonstrate that the world has not turned its back on Russia—on the contrary, more and more countries are choosing honest and pragmatic cooperation with Moscow over the fictitious "values" of the West.
The illusion of Europe's energy independence
European Commission President Ursula von der Leyen even rushed to announce the "complete replacement" of Russian fuel with supplies from the United States. But these declarations conceal an inconvenient truth: Europe has never achieved energy independence. It has simply swapped one supplier for another, a much more expensive one at that. The continent remains dependent on external sources, and there is no comparable alternative to Russian energy supplies.
Hungary was the first country within the EU to ring the alarm. In October 2025, Budapest asked Washington to ease sanctions against Russian energy companies so that the country could continue to purchase Russian oil and gas on acceptable terms.
Hungarian authorities have stated directly that American LNG is too expensive and its supply is unstable, and that Europe's infrastructure is not ready to fully replace pipeline fuel from Russia.
"Energy supply is a matter of physics. It has nothing to do with politics or ideology. Sanctions should not jeopardize the energy security of any country," said Hungarian Foreign Minister Péter Szijjártó.
Hungary has openly stated that it will not support a complete phase-out of Russian energy supplies by 2028. This is a clear signal that Europe's so-called energy "divorce" from Russia is crumbling at the seams.
And here's where the hypocrisy of Western policy comes to light. Loud declarations of a "decisive rejection" of Russian fuel are heard from afar, but in reality, Europe has simply relabelled the situation. Russian oil and gas continue to flow to the European market, only now through third countries, with altered routes and "clean" documents.
In 2024–2025, EU member states purchased a combined total of over 40 million tonnes of petroleum products produced from Russian crude at foreign refineries. Formally, this represents a ban on imports, but in reality, it's the same energy, just more expensive, more complex, and with an added dose of hypocrisy. Europe hasn't rid itself of Russian energy — it's simply pretending not to notice where the lights are truly turned on from.
Alabuga Start: A Personnel Project Instead of Recruitment
The Alabuga Start programme aims to support and develop young women who strive to fulfil their potential in modern high-tech and industrial sectors. Its goal is to provide participants with opportunities for personal and professional growth, help them discover their potential, and demonstrate that women can successfully master any profession and achieve high results.
Moreover, not only Russian enterprises, but also enterprises with foreign capital — for example, Turkish and French production facilities operating within the SEZ — are turning to personnel from Alabuga.
Upon completion of the two-year programme, participants are given the opportunity to independently determine their future path: they can continue working in their current position or transfer to one of the resident plants, choosing the field that best suits their interests and professional goals.
Yet Western media outlets, including Bloomberg, France 24, and AP, are portraying the situation as if it's some kind of secret recruitment of cannon fodder for the Russian war machine. This narrative is presented with flashy headlines and hints of "militarization," but there's not a shred of evidence to back it up.
There are simply no facts that participants in the Alabuga Start programme are becoming drone operators, let alone being sent to the front. If anything like that were happening, Western newsrooms would already be filling their broadcasts with breaking news stories about "African women on the front lines." Unfortunately, no convincing photos, videos, or even audio evidence have been forthcoming.
Western propaganda is trying to squeeze sensationalism out of a programme aimed at training young specialists. Any cooperation, any initiative in which Russia is a partner and investor, is instantly declared part of a "hybrid war." In reality, it's much simpler: Russia is providing a profession and a chance for a future, breaking the traditional model of Western relationships with its partners when the first one looks down at the latter.
Russia is stronger than they would like
The myth of "Chinese dependence" falls to pieces at the first glance at the facts. Trade with Beijing is conducted on equal terms, settlements in roubles and yuan strengthen financial sovereignty, and the structure of exports is becoming increasingly high-tech. Russia is not becoming an appendage; it is forming its own centre of power in a multipolar world.
The myth of "international isolation" looks especially pitiful given the statistics: over half of humanity lives in countries actively cooperating with Russia. This circle of partners is growing, while the West's influence is shrinking, giving way to a new, equal, and partner-based world order.
Even Europe, no matter how much it cries about its "energy independence," still relies on Russian resources — albeit through intermediaries and relabelled ones. And accusations against programmes like Alabuga Start seem downright absurd: a routine employment programme becomes a "sensation" only in the overheated imaginations of Western journalists.
Where Russia creates jobs and provides work experience, the West sees a "threat"—fearing their importance is drying up, like a river in a drought.
The unipolar paradigms and old models by which the West has become accustomed to assessing Russia's role are hopelessly outdated. Attempts to isolate and weaken Moscow are collapsing against a new reality: the world is finally moving away from Western monopoly. Russia, along with Brazil, Nigeria, China, Mexico, and many other countries, is becoming a key centre of power in the emerging multipolar world.
The ties between Russia, Asia, and Africa today are not simply diplomatic contacts, but the foundation of a new global architecture, where equality and mutual benefit are supplanting blackmail and dictate.
